To thine own self be true. Shakespeare said it in Hamlet Act 1, scene 3 according to the internet. But it hold true for each country and their curriculum I think. We can learn a lot by looking at what different countries do and then decide what we should do. But we have to do what works for us and for our teaching. I have worked in several districts and in many of them, teachers are tired of trying new ways every time something changes. We have gone through local assessments that were laboriously written, piloted, revised, standardized, and abandoned. We had the MEAs and now we have the NECAPs. It is good that we haven't given up but are we taking the time to find out if what we are doing is working? Change takes time and it seems to me we have had too many changes too fast. I think we need to slow down and see what works.
I think we need a clearer picture of what we want. Do we want good test scores? Do we want creative learners? Do we want to help produce people who will be happy successful adults in society? I think we want it all! But sometimes I wonder if we are seeing the trees for the forest.
The reading and listening has given me a lot to think about this week. I was listening to the Seminar that Linda Darling-Hammond presented and thinking it sounded very familiar then I realized it was linked to the article of her's that we read. No wonder the examples were the same! I like the idea of Assessments for learning. I like the idea of assessing as we learn, not always a paper and pencil way
We need to do what we do well and keep doing it. Zhao said that American schools are respected in other countries and I know this to be true. The University of Maine has a large number of international students. In any class, including this one, I have taken there are usually students from other countries. I have been fortunate to make friends with many of them. Our engineering school has student from other countries arriving and graduating all the time. Many come here for their doctorates. Part of that may be because it is less expensive but still they come. More and more of our high schools are selling themselves internationally. Orono and Millinocket are courting students from China. Lee Academy has a number of students from various countries. So we should continue to do what we do well and fix what we don't do well.
One of the things we don't do well is educate globally literate students. Education majors are not required, as far as I know, to take a foreign language. There is a joke that is ironic that asks what trilingual means. The reply is to speak 3 languages. Bilingual is 2. Monolingual is Americans. Having been involved with the AFS exchange program in the past I have known many students from other countries who spoke more that one or two languages. My daughter Sveta, from Belarus, now has so many I lose count. She came here with Russian, Belorussian, English, and smattering of French. She went to University in Lithuania so learned that language, then married a German, and speaks that language as well. One middle school I worked in did not even teach a language.
We do need for our students to understand other cultures. It could be done in Social Studies classes or integrated into other classes. A current event section would be good even just as a part of the school day. We do sometimes watch Channel One at school and that does a good job of talking about subjects that interest the students. You can always tell when it is really good because the room quiets as the kids listen.
As I read these articles I realized that I am more globally literate than I had realized. I was in Japan when I interviewed for the job I have now. I have hosted in my home students from too many countries to list. I think I am happiest that I have an ongoing program where students from a college in Japan shadow my students for a day. Both sets of students get a tremendous amount from that one day.
In my ten years of teaching I have repeatedly heard from many veteran teachers "this too shall pass". Because so many things have been not been followed through on many teachers have understandedly taken on the attitude of "why put any time into this when most likely nothing will ever become of it anyways".
ReplyDeleteIn the last year or two my school has become a J-1 visa issuing school (I think that is the right term). In fact my principal is headed China and/or Vietnam this spring to develop better relations with school in those countries. I believe it is Vietnam who is building a school and our principal has told us that one day we may have the opportunity to "switch" schools for a year where a teacher from Vietnam would come teach at CHRHS for a year and vice versa. I don't follow the information that gets relayed to us too closely right now as it is not something I would be interested in doing at this point in my life, but I do think about what an opportunity this could/will be for teachers at my school.
I agree 100% that we need our students to gain a better understanding of other cultures. I had a student from China in my Lab Chemistry course for the first semester this year and from time to time we had conversations in class about what school was like in China compared to the US. I really enjoyed watching my students help this student translate the meaning of different words. I think it gave them a glimpse of what it might be like to go to another country for a semester or a year where English is not the primary language.
Cathy,
ReplyDeleteI think that perhaps what is lacking is a vision of where we want to take our education system. As everyone is blown around by the wind of fashion and fad, no real commitment is made to any one path. I see on the state website that they are really getting into the Core Curriculum, and using P21 to critique what is going on with it. I am sure it is not perfect but it is a good place to start. Incorporating international studies into the curriculum is hugely important and can even be fun. I look forward to seeing where it will go.
Karla
I agree with many things you said. We tend to adopt every new policy and innovation, train extensively to figure out how to squeeze it onto an already loaded plate, and then forget the important step - letting it work for a bit before assessing if it should be kept or chucked. Whether it is the constant revision of the schedule, re-focusing of PLC time, new teams and teacher leadership cohort groups, how we approach advisory, or curriculum revision, it is tiring to be in constant flux. Worse, students voice this as well, and if students are tired of constant change with only their short residence time, then I believe we are truly changing too often! There is something to be said for stability, and I think this is one "innovation" that schools could benefit from - although I despise the "this too, shall pass" mentality many frustrated teachers now possess, I fully embrace careful thought and cautious adoption instead of the bandwagon I feel like I now ride...
ReplyDelete